Mozambique vs Sweden: Food Transport — Energy Use

Mozambique
18.62 TJ
in 2023
Sweden
22.08 TJ
in 2023
Mozambique rank
57th
Sweden rank
54th

Food Transport — Energy Use over time

  • Mozambique
  • Sweden
050100150200199320082023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 22.08 TJ against 18.62 TJ in Mozambique, a difference of 3.46 TJ.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 57th and Sweden ranks 54th of 65 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5867 TJ 77.16 TJ 76.57 TJ Sweden
2010s 9.27 TJ 115.52 TJ 106.25 TJ Sweden
2020s 12.19 TJ 26.52 TJ 14.33 TJ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — energy use, Mozambique or Sweden?
Sweden, at 22.08 TJ against 18.62 TJ in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — energy use between Mozambique and Sweden?
3.46 TJ, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sweden?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Sweden rank globally for food transport — energy use?
Mozambique ranks 57th and Sweden ranks 54th of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Sweden: Food Transport — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/mozambique/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/mozambique/sweden/">Mozambique vs Sweden: Food Transport — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
102 places, 2,449 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.