Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Food Transport — Energy Use

Myanmar
848.54 TJ
in 2023
Russian Federation
1,192 TJ
in 2023
Myanmar rank
19th
Russian Federation rank
17th

Food Transport — Energy Use over time

  • Myanmar
  • Russian Federation
02.0k4.0k6.0k199220072023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1,192 TJ against 848.54 TJ in Myanmar, a difference of 343.46 TJ.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Myanmar ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 17th of 65 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 144.61 TJ 311.96 TJ 167.35 TJ Russian Federation
2010s 868.75 TJ 638.58 TJ 230.16 TJ Myanmar
2020s 692.75 TJ 1,040 TJ 347.4 TJ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — energy use, Myanmar or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 1,192 TJ against 848.54 TJ in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — energy use between Myanmar and Russian Federation?
343.46 TJ, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Russian Federation?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Russian Federation rank globally for food transport — energy use?
Myanmar ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 17th of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Food Transport — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/myanmar/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/myanmar/russian-federation-2/">Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Food Transport — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
102 places, 2,449 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.