Pakistan vs South-Eastern Asia: Food Transport — Energy Use

Pakistan
2,649 TJ
in 2023
South-Eastern Asia
6,510 TJ
in 2023
Pakistan rank
13th
South-Eastern Asia rank
14th

Food Transport — Energy Use over time

  • Pakistan
  • South-Eastern Asia
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia currently reports 6,510 TJ against 2,649 TJ in Pakistan, a difference of 3,861 TJ.

That makes South-Eastern Asia's figure about 2.5 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was South-Eastern Asia ahead.

Pakistan ranks 13th and South-Eastern Asia ranks 14th of 65 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and South-Eastern Asia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan South-Eastern Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 62.46 TJ 21.45 TJ 41.01 TJ Pakistan
2000s 4,749 TJ 1,525 TJ 3,224 TJ Pakistan
2010s 9,101 TJ 12,763 TJ 3,661 TJ South-Eastern Asia
2020s 3,479 TJ 6,550 TJ 3,072 TJ South-Eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — energy use, Pakistan or South-Eastern Asia?
South-Eastern Asia, at 6,510 TJ against 2,649 TJ in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — energy use between Pakistan and South-Eastern Asia?
3,861 TJ, with South-Eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and South-Eastern Asia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and South-Eastern Asia rank globally for food transport — energy use?
Pakistan ranks 13th and South-Eastern Asia ranks 14th of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs South-Eastern Asia: Food Transport — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/pakistan/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/pakistan/south-eastern-asia/">Pakistan vs South-Eastern Asia: Food Transport — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
102 places, 2,449 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.