Egypt vs Iraq: Forest fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Egypt
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Iraq
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Egypt rank
109th
Iraq rank
109th
Forest fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Egypt
- Iraq
How they compare
Egypt currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iraq, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Iraq ahead.
Egypt ranks 109th and Iraq ranks 109th of 184 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.48 % change on previous year | 45.6 % change on previous year | 3.12 % change on previous year | Iraq |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | 45.41 % change on previous year | 145.41 % change on previous year | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, annual growth rate, Egypt or Iraq?
- Egypt, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iraq as of 2000.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, annual growth rate between Egypt and Iraq?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iraq?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
- How do Egypt and Iraq rank globally for forest fires — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Egypt ranks 109th and Iraq ranks 109th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.