Gibraltar vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Gibraltar rank
109th
Polynesia rank
109th
Forest fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Gibraltar
- Polynesia
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 109th and Polynesia ranks 109th of 184 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, annual growth rate, Gibraltar or Polynesia?
- Gibraltar, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, annual growth rate between Gibraltar and Polynesia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Gibraltar ranks 109th and Polynesia ranks 109th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.