Armenia vs Namibia: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Armenia
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Armenia rank
122nd
Namibia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Armenia
- Namibia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Armenia ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109.05 ha | 1,647 ha | 1,538 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 55.88 ha | 887.55 ha | 831.68 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 154.72 ha | 57.77 ha | 96.95 ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 305.09 ha | 158.33 ha | 146.76 ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Armenia or Namibia?
- Armenia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Armenia and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Armenia ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.