Aruba vs Libya: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Aruba
0 ha
in 2024
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Aruba rank
122nd
Libya rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Aruba
- Libya
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Aruba or Libya?
- Aruba, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Aruba and Libya?
- 0 ha, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Libya rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Aruba ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.