Barbados vs Namibia: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Barbados
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Barbados rank
122nd
Namibia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Barbados
- Namibia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 1,459 ha | 1,459 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 887.55 ha | 887.55 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Barbados or Namibia?
- Barbados, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Barbados and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Barbados ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.