Belgium-Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Forest fires — Burned Area
Belgium-Luxembourg
22.57 ha
in 1999
New Caledonia
42.81 ha
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
105th
New Caledonia rank
103rd
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 42.81 ha against 22.57 ha in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 20.24 ha.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.9 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 105th and New Caledonia ranks 103rd of 219 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Belgium-Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 42.81 ha against 22.57 ha in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Belgium-Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 20.24 ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 105th and New Caledonia ranks 103rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.