Belgium vs Rwanda: Forest fires — Burned Area
Belgium
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium rank
111th
Rwanda rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Belgium
- Rwanda
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Belgium ranks 111th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.18 ha | 191.05 ha | 175.86 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 10.77 ha | 190.2 ha | 179.43 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 111.13 ha | 111.13 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Belgium or Rwanda?
- Belgium, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Belgium and Rwanda?
- 0 ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Rwanda rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Belgium ranks 111th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.