Burkina Faso vs Estonia: Forest fires — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Estonia
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
112th
Estonia rank
112th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Estonia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Estonia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 112th and Estonia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83,634 ha | 145.94 ha | 83,488 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 12,345 ha | 192.64 ha | 12,152 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 6.41 ha | 34.53 ha | 28.11 ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Burkina Faso or Estonia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Burkina Faso and Estonia?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Estonia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 112th and Estonia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.