Eritrea vs French Polynesia: Forest fires — Burned Area
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
French Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
111th
French Polynesia rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 111th and French Polynesia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 328.14 ha | 2.25 ha | 325.89 ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 261.06 ha | 0 ha | 261.06 ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Eritrea or French Polynesia?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha against 0 ha in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Eritrea and French Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and French Polynesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and French Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 111th and French Polynesia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.