Eritrea vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
122nd
Polynesia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Eritrea
- Polynesia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 328.14 ha | 159.68 ha | 168.47 ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 261.06 ha | 3.5 ha | 257.56 ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 100.52 ha | 100.52 ha | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Eritrea or Polynesia?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Eritrea and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Polynesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Eritrea ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.