Finland vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Finland rank
122nd
Polynesia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Finland
- Polynesia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 174.63 ha | 132 ha | 42.62 ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 106.35 ha | 3.5 ha | 102.85 ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 47.5 ha | 100.52 ha | 53.02 ha | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 21.6 ha | 0 ha | 21.6 ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Finland or Polynesia?
- Finland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Finland and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Finland ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.