Grenada vs Iceland: Forest fires — Burned Area
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Iceland
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
111th
Iceland rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Grenada
- Iceland
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Iceland, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 111th and Iceland ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8679 ha | 0 ha | 0.8679 ha | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.158 ha | 0 ha | 0.158 ha | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Grenada or Iceland?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Grenada and Iceland?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Iceland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Iceland rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Grenada ranks 111th and Iceland ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.