Grenada vs Mauritius: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
122nd
Mauritius rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Grenada
- Mauritius
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Grenada ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8679 ha | 6 ha | 5.13 ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.158 ha | 0 ha | 0.158 ha | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Grenada or Mauritius?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Grenada and Mauritius?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Grenada ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.