Grenada vs Rwanda: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
122nd
Rwanda rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Grenada
- Rwanda
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 122nd and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8679 ha | 667.76 ha | 666.89 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.158 ha | 191.05 ha | 190.89 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 190.2 ha | 190.2 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 111.13 ha | 111.13 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Grenada or Rwanda?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Grenada and Rwanda?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Rwanda rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Grenada ranks 122nd and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.