Ireland vs Namibia: Forest fires — Burned Area
Ireland
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Ireland rank
111th
Namibia rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Ireland
- Namibia
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Ireland ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.28 ha | 1,459 ha | 1,372 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 49.09 ha | 887.55 ha | 838.46 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 43.11 ha | 57.77 ha | 14.66 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 30.18 ha | 158.33 ha | 128.15 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Ireland or Namibia?
- Ireland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Ireland and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Ireland ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.