Israel vs Namibia: Forest fires — Burned Area
Israel
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Israel rank
111th
Namibia rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Israel
- Namibia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.05 ha | 1,459 ha | 1,458 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 887.55 ha | 887.55 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Israel or Namibia?
- Israel, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Israel and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Israel ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.