Kazakhstan vs Lebanon: Forest fires — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Lebanon
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
112th
Lebanon rank
112th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Lebanon, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 112th and Lebanon ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,653 ha | 9.33 ha | 11,643 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 2,014 ha | 2.15 ha | 2,012 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 163.72 ha | 2.15 ha | 161.57 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 887.1 ha | 21.46 ha | 865.64 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Kazakhstan or Lebanon?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 0 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lebanon rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 112th and Lebanon ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.