Lithuania vs Samoa: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Lithuania
0 ha
in 2024
Samoa
0 ha
in 2024
Lithuania rank
122nd
Samoa rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Lithuania
- Samoa
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Samoa, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Samoa ahead.
Lithuania ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.04 ha | 146.12 ha | 77.08 ha | Samoa |
| 2000s | 130.09 ha | 3.5 ha | 126.6 ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 8.63 ha | 100.52 ha | 91.89 ha | Samoa |
| 2020s | 8.63 ha | 0 ha | 8.63 ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Lithuania or Samoa?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Lithuania and Samoa?
- 0 ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Samoa?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Samoa rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Lithuania ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.