Malta vs Pitcairn: Forest fires — Burned Area
Malta
0 ha
in 2024
Pitcairn
0 ha
in 2024
Malta rank
111th
Pitcairn rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Malta
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Pitcairn has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 111th and Pitcairn ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Malta or Pitcairn?
- Malta, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Malta and Pitcairn?
- 0 ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Pitcairn?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Pitcairn rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Malta ranks 111th and Pitcairn ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.