Mauritius vs Pitcairn: Forest fires — Burned Area
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Pitcairn
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
111th
Pitcairn rank
111th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Mauritius
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 111th and Pitcairn ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 ha | 0 ha | 6 ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Mauritius or Pitcairn?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Mauritius and Pitcairn?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Pitcairn?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Pitcairn rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Mauritius ranks 111th and Pitcairn ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.