Mauritius vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
122nd
Polynesia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Mauritius
- Polynesia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 ha | 132 ha | 126 ha | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 3.5 ha | 3.5 ha | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 100.52 ha | 100.52 ha | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Mauritius or Polynesia?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Mauritius and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Mauritius ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.