Morocco vs Namibia: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Morocco
21.47 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Morocco rank
120th
Namibia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Morocco
- Namibia
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 21.47 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 21.47 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Morocco ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 380.08 ha | 1,459 ha | 1,079 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 382.81 ha | 887.55 ha | 504.75 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 251.14 ha | 57.77 ha | 193.37 ha | Morocco |
| 2020s | 1,593 ha | 158.33 ha | 1,434 ha | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Morocco or Namibia?
- Morocco, at 21.47 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Morocco and Namibia?
- 21.47 ha, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Morocco and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Morocco ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.