Namibia vs Turkmenistan: Forest fires — Burned Area
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia rank
112th
Turkmenistan rank
112th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Namibia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 112th and Turkmenistan ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,647 ha | 24.66 ha | 1,622 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 887.55 ha | 7.52 ha | 880.04 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 57.77 ha | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 158.33 ha | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Namibia or Turkmenistan?
- Namibia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Turkmenistan rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Namibia ranks 112th and Turkmenistan ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.