Namibia vs Tuvalu: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Tuvalu
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia rank
122nd
Tuvalu rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Namibia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 122nd and Tuvalu ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,459 ha | 0 ha | 1,459 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 887.55 ha | 0 ha | 887.55 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 57.77 ha | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 158.33 ha | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Namibia or Tuvalu?
- Namibia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Namibia and Tuvalu?
- 0 ha, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Tuvalu rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Namibia ranks 122nd and Tuvalu ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.