Norway vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Burned Area
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Norway rank
124th
Polynesia rank
124th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Norway
- Polynesia
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 124th and Polynesia ranks 124th of 240 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 238.87 ha | 132 ha | 106.87 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 92.31 ha | 3.5 ha | 88.82 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 32.4 ha | 100.52 ha | 68.12 ha | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Norway or Polynesia?
- Norway, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Norway and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Norway ranks 124th and Polynesia ranks 124th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.