Polynesia vs Tokelau: Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Tokelau
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia rank
122nd
Tokelau rank
122nd
Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Polynesia
- Tokelau
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tokelau, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Polynesia ahead.
Polynesia ranks 122nd and Tokelau ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 132 ha | 0 ha | 132 ha | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 3.5 ha | 0 ha | 3.5 ha | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 100.52 ha | 0 ha | 100.52 ha | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1, Polynesia or Tokelau?
- Polynesia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1 between Polynesia and Tokelau?
- 0 ha, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Tokelau?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Polynesia and Tokelau rank globally for forest fires — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Polynesia ranks 122nd and Tokelau ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.