Isle of Man vs Namibia: Forest fires — Burned Area, per capita
Isle of Man
0 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
102nd
Namibia rank
102nd
Forest fires — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Isle of Man
- Namibia
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, per capita, Isle of Man or Namibia?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, per capita between Isle of Man and Namibia?
- 0 ha per person, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — burned area, per capita?
- Isle of Man ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.