Israel vs Mauritius: Forest fires — Burned Area, per capita
Israel
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha per person
in 2024
Israel rank
102nd
Mauritius rank
102nd
Forest fires — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Israel ranks 102nd and Mauritius ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, per capita, Israel or Mauritius?
- Israel, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, per capita between Israel and Mauritius?
- 0 ha per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for forest fires — burned area, per capita?
- Israel ranks 102nd and Mauritius ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.