Grenada vs Latvia: Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Grenada
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Grenada rank
100th
Latvia rank
100th
Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Grenada
- Latvia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp, Grenada or Latvia?
- Grenada, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp between Grenada and Latvia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Grenada ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 100th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.