Isle of Man vs Latvia: Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Isle of Man
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
100th
Latvia rank
100th
Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Isle of Man
- Latvia
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp, Isle of Man or Latvia?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp between Isle of Man and Latvia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
- How do Isle of Man and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Isle of Man ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 100th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.