Rwanda vs Sweden: Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Rwanda
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda rank
100th
Sweden rank
100th
Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 100th and Sweden ranks 100th of 183 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 100th and Sweden ranks 100th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.