China, Hong Kong SAR vs Samoa: Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Samoa
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
109th
Samoa rank
109th

Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Samoa
-1000100200300400199120032015

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Samoa, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Samoa ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 109th and Samoa ranks 109th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 13.23 % change on previous year 25.1 % change on previous year 11.86 % change on previous year Samoa
2000s -80.25 % change on previous year -90.58 % change on previous year 10.33 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Samoa?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Samoa as of 2015.
What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Samoa?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Samoa?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Samoa rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 109th and Samoa ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Samoa: Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/samoa/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Samoa: Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,529 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.