Gibraltar vs Latvia: Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
109th
Latvia rank
109th
Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Gibraltar
- Latvia
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 109th and Latvia ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Gibraltar or Latvia?
- Gibraltar, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Gibraltar and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Gibraltar ranks 109th and Latvia ranks 109th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.