New Zealand vs Serbia and Montenegro: Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

New Zealand
114.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
100.08 % change on previous year
in 2005
New Zealand rank
30th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
31st

Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • New Zealand
  • Serbia and Montenegro
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 114.2 % change on previous year against 100.08 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 14.12 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.

New Zealand ranks 30th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 31st of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s -12.78 % change on previous year 98.19 % change on previous year 110.98 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro
2000s 57.38 % change on previous year 36.55 % change on previous year 20.84 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), New Zealand or Serbia and Montenegro?
New Zealand, at 114.2 % change on previous year against 100.08 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between New Zealand and Serbia and Montenegro?
14.12 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia and Montenegro?
11 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do New Zealand and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
New Zealand ranks 30th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Serbia and Montenegro: Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/serbia-and-montenegro/">New Zealand vs Serbia and Montenegro: Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,529 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.