Belgium vs Solomon Islands: Forest fires — Burning crop residues
Belgium
0 t
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0 t
in 2024
Belgium rank
112th
Solomon Islands rank
112th
Forest fires — Burning crop residues over time
- Belgium
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 112th and Solomon Islands ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 765.18 t | 115.65 t | 649.54 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 542.77 t | 115.66 t | 427.11 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues, Belgium or Solomon Islands?
- Belgium, at 0 t against 0 t in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues between Belgium and Solomon Islands?
- 0 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Solomon Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Solomon Islands rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues?
- Belgium ranks 112th and Solomon Islands ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.