Eritrea vs Latvia: Forest fires — Burning crop residues
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea rank
112th
Latvia rank
112th
Forest fires — Burning crop residues over time
- Eritrea
- Latvia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,753 t | 7,951 t | 9,801 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 14,123 t | 26,357 t | 12,234 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 4,240 t | 4,240 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 217.46 t | 217.46 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues, Eritrea or Latvia?
- Eritrea, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues between Eritrea and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues?
- Eritrea ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.