French Polynesia vs Latvia: Forest fires — Burning crop residues
French Polynesia
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
112th
Latvia rank
112th
Forest fires — Burning crop residues over time
- French Polynesia
- Latvia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109.89 t | 8,374 t | 8,264 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t | 26,357 t | 26,357 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 4,240 t | 4,240 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 217.46 t | 217.46 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues, French Polynesia or Latvia?
- French Polynesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues between French Polynesia and Latvia?
- 0 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues?
- French Polynesia ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.