Ireland vs Sweden: Forest fires — Burning crop residues
Ireland
0 t
in 2024
Sweden
0 t
in 2024
Ireland rank
112th
Sweden rank
112th
Forest fires — Burning crop residues over time
- Ireland
- Sweden
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Ireland ranks 112th and Sweden ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,399 t | 18,388 t | 13,989 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 2,474 t | 2,628 t | 153.34 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2,173 t | 45,683 t | 43,511 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1,521 t | 0 t | 1,521 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues, Ireland or Sweden?
- Ireland, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues between Ireland and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Sweden rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues?
- Ireland ranks 112th and Sweden ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.