Latvia vs Rwanda: Forest fires — Burning crop residues
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Rwanda
0 t
in 2024
Latvia rank
112th
Rwanda rank
112th
Forest fires — Burning crop residues over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Rwanda ahead.
Latvia ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,374 t | 40,640 t | 32,265 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 26,357 t | 9,798 t | 16,559 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4,240 t | 9,586 t | 5,346 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 217.46 t | 5,601 t | 5,383 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues?
- Latvia ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.