Mauritius vs Rwanda: Forest fires — Burning crop residues
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Rwanda
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
112th
Rwanda rank
112th
Forest fires — Burning crop residues over time
- Mauritius
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 302.48 t | 35,827 t | 35,524 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 t | 9,798 t | 9,798 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 t | 9,586 t | 9,586 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 t | 5,601 t | 5,601 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Rwanda?
- Mauritius, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Rwanda?
- 0 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Rwanda rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues?
- Mauritius ranks 112th and Rwanda ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.