Australia vs Zimbabwe: Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Australia
1.06 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
51st
Zimbabwe rank
54th

Forest fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Australia
  • Zimbabwe
05101520199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.06 t per square kilometre against 1 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.06 t per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 4.07 t per square kilometre 3.61 t per square kilometre 0.4684 t per square kilometre Australia
2000s 3.24 t per square kilometre 2.85 t per square kilometre 0.3931 t per square kilometre Australia
2010s 3.8 t per square kilometre 5.2 t per square kilometre 1.39 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 3.44 t per square kilometre 1.1 t per square kilometre 2.35 t per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Australia or Zimbabwe?
Australia, at 1.06 t per square kilometre against 1 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Australia and Zimbabwe?
0.06 t per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Australia ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zimbabwe: Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/">Australia vs Zimbabwe: Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 6,245 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Forest fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.