Sweden vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden rank
109th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
109th

Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Sweden ranks 109th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 109th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 61.5 % change on previous year 25.64 % change on previous year 35.86 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s -84.02 % change on previous year 66.44 % change on previous year 150.45 % change on previous year United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s -100 % change on previous year -3.41 % change on previous year 96.59 % change on previous year United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Sweden or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Sweden and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
How do Sweden and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Sweden ranks 109th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 109th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/sweden/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/sweden/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Sweden vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 5,512 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.