Aruba vs Grenada: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Aruba
0 kt
in 2024
Grenada
0 kt
in 2024
Aruba rank
122nd
Grenada rank
122nd
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Grenada, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 122nd and Grenada ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Aruba or Grenada?
- Aruba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Aruba ranks 122nd and Grenada ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.