Belgium-Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4)
Belgium-Luxembourg
0.0053 kt
in 1999
New Caledonia
0.0053 kt
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
100th
New Caledonia rank
100th
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0.0053 kt against 0.0053 kt in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 10 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 100th and New Caledonia ranks 100th of 219 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Belgium-Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0.0053 kt against 0.0053 kt in New Caledonia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Belgium-Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 0 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 100th and New Caledonia ranks 100th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.