Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Forest fires — Emissions
Belgium
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Belgium rank
112th
Sri Lanka rank
112th
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Belgium ranks 112th and Sri Lanka ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.002 kt | 0.0878 kt | 0.0857 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0076 kt | 0.0064 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 112th and Sri Lanka ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.