China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sweden: Forest fires — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
112th
Sweden rank
112th
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Sweden
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 112th and Sweden ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0057 kt | 0.0626 kt | 0.0569 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0067 kt | 0.0068 kt | 0.0001 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0012 kt | 0.1051 kt | 0.1038 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sweden?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 112th and Sweden ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.