China, Macao SAR vs Namibia: Forest fires — Emissions
China, Macao SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Namibia
0 kt
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
111th
Namibia rank
111th
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Namibia
How they compare
China, Macao SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
China, Macao SAR ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.5288 kt | 0.5288 kt | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.3217 kt | 0.3217 kt | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0067 kt | 0.0067 kt | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0184 kt | 0.0184 kt | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, China, Macao SAR or Namibia?
- China, Macao SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between China, Macao SAR and Namibia?
- 0 kt, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 111th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.